First Reported Case of Dulaglutide-Induced Acute Pancreatitis With Normal Serum Lipase Level.

Dulaglutide is being extensively used for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure and is also being used as an off-label weight loss aid. Due to its wide use, we had to shed some light on this rare finding of normal lipase level in a patient with signs and symptoms suggestive of acute pancreatitis. A high index of clinical suspicion for acute pancreatitis despite normal lipase should warrant a low threshold for radiological imaging to rule it out.

Post-dural puncture headache prevention and treatment with aminophylline or theophylline: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common complications in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the therapeutic and prophylactic effects of aminophylline and theophylline on PDPH. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by searching the following electronic databases, without language restriction, until June 2020: Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Cochrane Library-CENTRAL, and CINAHL Complete. Random effects models were used to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to assess the therapeutic and prophylactic effects of aminophylline and theophylline on PDPH, respectively. The Cochrane tool was used for the quality assessment of the included studies. The certainty of the evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. RESULTS: Of the 1,349 initial records, 15 met our eligibility criteria (6 studies on therapeutic and 9 on prophylactic effects). A significant reduction in the pain score was observed following aminophylline/theophylline treatment (SMD = -1.67; 95% CI, -2.28 to -1.05; P < 0.001, I2 = 84.7%; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the therapeutic effect was significantly higher when these agents were compared to placebo than when conventional therapies were used. The risk of PDPH after aminophylline administration was not significantly reduced (RR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.31; P = 0.290). CONCLUSIONS: Theophylline and aminophylline have therapeutic, but not prophylactic, effects on PDPH.

Assessment of Analgesic Efficacy of Bilateral Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain following Lumbar Laminectomy: A Single-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a novel approach to minimizing postoperative pain. We investigated the efficacy and side effects of the ultrasonography-guided bilateral ESP block in reducing pain in the first 24 hours after lumbar laminectomy. Materials and Methods: We conducted a single-blind (statistical analyst and those responsible for recording patient information postoperation were unaware of the study groups) randomized clinical trial on 50 patients aged 18 to 65 with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class I or II physical status scheduled for lumbar laminectomy surgery at Shahid Chamran Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. Patients were randomly allocated to the ESP block (26 participants) or control (24 participants) group. A bilateral ESP block was administered to patients in the first group before general anesthesia, which was provided identically to both groups. The postoperative time to the first request of analgesia, pain score, total opioid use, side effects, and patient satisfaction were compared between the groups. Results: Compared with the control group, patients in the ESP block group had significantly more postoperative pain relief in the first hour and until 24 hours (P < 0.05). The total opioid consumption was lower in the ESP block group (P < 0.001). However, the ESP block led to a higher rate of urinary retention (P = 0.008). Conclusion: The bilateral ESP block effectively reduces postoperative pain following lumbar laminectomy, minimizing the need for narcotics. Further research is needed to delineate ways to reduce urinary retention as its main complication. This trial is registered with IRCT20100127003213N6.

Analgesic effect of ketorolac added to lidocaine in surgery of traumatic arm injuries: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

Acute pain after surgery can cause harmful effects. There are many ways to treat pain after surgery. Bier block technique is also a type of intravenous regional anesthesia that is suitable for short and minor surgeries of the arm, wrist, and fingers, so this study aims to compare the analgesic effect of Ketorolac in intravenous injection and when the lidocaine is added to Bier block. In surgery, traumatic injuries to the upper limbs. This study was a clinical trial, randomized and double-blind. The target population was candidates for upper limb orthopedic surgery. The patients selected based on the entry and exit criteria were randomly assigned to one of the 3 study groups. The intensity of pain, the amount of morphine consumed through the intravenous PCA pump, the incidence of side effects of morphine and ketorolac, as well as the overall patient satisfaction regarding the anesthesia method and pain control were compared between the groups. Data analysis, both descriptive and analytical, was done using SPSS statistical software version 21. The three studied groups were identical and had no differences in terms of quantitative and qualitative demographic variables. The median tourniquet closing time is different between the control group and the intravenous ketorolac and topical ketorolac groups with P=0.002 and P=0.001, respectively. There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of the time of the first request to receive painkillers after deflating the tourniquet, but the amount of morphine received between the groups was significantly different (P=0.02). Comparison of pain intensity based on NRS, considering Taking the measurement repetition times indicated the significance of the effect of pain intensity between the groups (P=0.001). In terms of overall satisfaction with the quality of analgesia and anesthesia method, no significant difference was observed between the three study groups. In terms of the occurrence of complications related to the use of ketorolac, no complications were observed in any of the groups receiving this drug. In general, by conducting this study, it can be said that the administration of Ketorolac reduces the intensity of postoperative pain in the recovery room and transfer to the inpatient ward, and reduces the amount of morphine received by patients, but the time of the first request for pain relief by the patient It does not significantly delay and does not affect the overall satisfaction of patients with the quality of analgesia during and after the operation and their satisfaction with the anesthesia method they received.

Effect of continuous intra-incisional bupivacaine on postoperative pain in non-traumatic spinal fixation surgeries: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Continuous injection of local anesthetics by using surgical wound catheters for postoperative pain relief has gained acceptance in recent years. However, whether this method can be alternatively used instead of systemic opioids in different surgical procedures has not yet been elucidated. Objectives The aim was to investigate the effect of continuous injection of bupivacaine through a catheter inside the surgical wound on reducing the postoperative pain of lumbar spine fusion surgeries. Methods In this clinical trial, 31 patients undergoing non-traumatic lumbar spine stabilization surgery were randomly assigned to receive (n = 15) or do not receive (n = 16) bupivacaine through a catheter inside the surgical wound, postoperatively. Pain intensity (NRS), dose of required morphine, and drug-related complications within 24 hours of intervention were assessed and compared by the Mann-Whitney and independent t-test. Results Mean pain intensity was significantly lower in the case group over the first postoperative hour in the recovery room (p < 0.001), which continued for the first 2 hours after entering the ward. The mean morphine intake was lower in the bupivacaine group during the first postoperative 24 hours (16 ± 0.88 vs. 7.33 ± 0.93 mg, p < 0.001). The two groups were not significantly different regarding drug-related complications. Conclusion Continuous intra-incisional infusion of bupivacaine helped better pain reduction during the early postoperative hours while sparing morphine consumption in the first postoperative day.

Effect of continuous intra-incisional bupivacaine on postoperative pain in non-traumatic spinal fixation surgeries: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Continuous injection of local anesthetics by using surgical wound catheters for postoperative pain relief has gained acceptance in recent years. However, whether this method can be alternatively used instead of systemic opioids in different surgical procedures has not yet been elucidated. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to investigate the effect of continuous injection of bupivacaine through a catheter inside the surgical wound on reducing the postoperative pain of lumbar spine fusion surgeries. METHODS: In this clinical trial, 31 patients undergoing non-traumatic lumbar spine stabilization surgery were randomly assigned to receive (n = 15) or do not receive (n = 16) bupivacaine through a catheter inside the surgical wound, postoperatively. Pain intensity (NRS), dose of required morphine, and drug-related complications within 24 hours of intervention were assessed and compared by the Mann-Whitney and independent t-test. RESULTS: Mean pain intensity was significantly lower in the case group over the first postoperative hour in the recovery room (p < 0.001), which continued for the first 2 hours after entering the ward. The mean morphine intake was lower in the bupivacaine group during the first postoperative 24 hours (16 ± 0.88 vs. 7.33 ± 0.93 mg, p < 0.001). The two groups were not significantly different regarding drug-related complications. CONCLUSION: Continuous intra-incisional infusion of bupivacaine helped better pain reduction during the early postoperative hours while sparing morphine consumption in the first postoperative day.

The effect of posterior tibial and sural nerve blocks on postoperative pain of patients following open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pain control and achieving opioid-free anesthesia are major issues for surgically treated patients with calcaneal fractures. We evaluated the potential role of posterior tibial and sural nerve blocks as a part of multimodal pain control techniques in patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of calcaneal fractures via extensile lateral approach. METHODS: Forty-eight patients randomly allocated to receive either posterior tibial and sural nerve blocks with bupivacaine (peripheral nerve block (PNB) group) or normal saline, after induction of general anesthesia. Patients were assessed for pain intensity, Interval from entrance to the recovery room to the first request for analgesic, recovery room and ward morphine consumption, global satisfaction and morphine side effects. RESULTS: PNB group had less pain score compared to sham block (SB) group at each time point measurement during recovery room stay. There was also significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the pain scores after 2, 4 and 6 h of the operation in the ward. Time to the first request for analgesic was significantly prolonged in the PNB group (P < 0.001). The recovery room and ward morphine consumption was significantly lower in the PNB group (P < 0.001). Global satisfaction in PNB group was significantly more than that of SB group. No complication related to the nerve block was detected at the first postoperative visit in the outpatient clinic. CONCLUSION: Peripheral nerve block could result in less postoperative pain especially in the early hours after ORIF of calcaneal fractures and reduce opioid administration within the first 24 h following the surgery.

The ability of Canadian Syncope risk score in differentiating cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic syncope; a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Determining the underlying etiology of syncope provides valuable prognostic information and expedites the implementation of a therapeutic strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) in differentiating cardiogenic and non-cardiac syncope. METHODS: The present diagnostic accuracy study was conducted on adult patients with syncope, who presented to the emergency departments of Shohadaye Tajrish and Imam Hossein Hospitals in Tehran from March 2018 to March 2019. The data required for determining CSRS were collected during the initial assessment and the underlying etiology was confirmed through further diagnostic follow-up under the supervision of a cardiologist or neurologist. Finally, the screening performance characteristics of the score were calculated. RESULTS: 300 patients with the mean age of 56.38 ± 19.10 years were studied. The source of syncope was cardiac in 133 (44.3%) and non-cardiac in 137 (55.7%) patients. The area under the ROC curve of CSRS in differentiating cardiac syncope was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.715-0.824). At a cutoff point of -1.5, the sensitivity and specificity of the score were calculated to be 73.68% (95% CI: 65.21-80.75%) and 73.05% (95%CI: 75.54-79.47%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The present study reveals that CSRS has fair accuracy in differentiating the source of syncope and has no superiority over a clinical examination. Therefore, we do not recommend relying on the CSRS to differentiate between cardiac and non-cardiac syncope alone.

Aminophylline for Prevention and/or Treatment of Post-Dural Puncture Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study Protocol.

OBJECTIVES: Post-dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is prevalent among individuals undergoing lumbar punctures. The non-invasive effect of some drugs, such as aminophylline on PDPH has been investigated in several clinical studies. As there is no comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis about the preventive and therapeutic effects of aminophylline on PDPH in the literature, the clinical effectiveness of this drug on the prevention and/or treatment of PDPH will be assessed in this study. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, WoS (Clarivate Analytics), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and Google Scholar as electronic databases will be precisely searched for clinical studies that assessed the effect of aminophylline on PDPH. Studies between 01-01-1980 and 30-06-2020 will be evaluated in this study, and there will not be any language restrictions. Contradictions between the reviewers within any phase of the study (screening, selecting, quality assessment, and data extraction) will be resolved by consensus; in case of unsolved disagreements, a third reviewer will eventually decide. The combination method will be applied according to the methodological resemblance in the selected articles using the Random Effect Model or the Fixed Effect Model. Also, for the included articles, forest plots will be drawn. For assessing statistical heterogeneity, the I2 statistic and the Q-statistic test will be applied. In addition, funnel plots will be used for assessing non-significant study effects and potential reporting bias. Furthermore, Egger's and Begg's tests will be done, and publication bias will be indicated by significant findings (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is expected that the results of this study will be of benefit to researchers and clinicians for managing PDPH, and will be reported in conferences and publications.

Portal Vein Thrombosis and Intra-Abdominal Hypertension Presenting as Complications of Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Severe Acute Pancreatitis.

A 44-year-old male without any significant past medical history presented to the emergency department (ED) with the chief complaint of severe constant epigastric pain for three hours. On physical examination, the abdomen was distended and tender, particularly in the epigastric region. The lab work showed an elevation of the lipase (12,405 U/L) and triglycerides (5,837 mg/dL). An abdominal CT scan with contrast was ordered, which revealed non-necrotic pancreatitis. In addition, the liver ultrasound showed no evidence of gallstones. Subsequently, fluid infusion, meropenem, pain medication, and an insulin drip were started, and the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). After six hours in the ICU, he complained of abdominal pain despite taking a high hydromorphone dose. On further physical examination, the abdomen was tender and distended but without rebound tenderness. The gastric distention on kidneys, ureter, and bladder (KUB) and a bladder pressure of 34 mmHg raised the suspicion for intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), which led us to place a nasogastric tube (NGT) and consult the surgical team. The patient's symptoms and bladder pressure were closely followed and showed significant improvement. On day seven in the ICU, the patient responded well to medications; feeding through the Dobhoff tube was started, and his triglycerides decreased to approximately 1,000 mg/dL. Despite his general improvement and meropenem regimen, the patient spiked a fever of 38.5 °C. Due to the possibility of pancreatitis complications, a CT abdomen with contrast was ordered, which showed partial portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Subsequently, enoxaparin was started, and the patient was closely observed for gastrointestinal bleeding. Eventually, after 17 days in the ICU, the patient was transferred to the floor and then discharged from the hospital with normal lab tests and without evidence of portal thrombosis on abdominal CT. In this report, we illustrate and discuss a case of hypertriglyceridemia (HTG)-induced pancreatitis (HTGP), which progressed to PVT and IAH. Physicians should be aware that patients with HTG are inclined to have severe pancreatitis. In addition, the degree of triglyceride elevation is correlated with the severity of acute pancreatitis.

Mepolizumab as Possible Treatment for Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis: A Review of Eight Cases.

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is an eosinophilic pulmonary disorder caused by a hypersensitivity reaction to Aspergillus fumigatus that manifests with uncontrolled asthma, peripheral blood eosinophilia, and radiological findings, such as mucus plugging. Early diagnosis and proper treatment of ABPA are essential to prevent irreversible lung damage such as pulmonary fibrosis and bronchiectasis and improve the quality of life of patients. Beside inhaled medication for asthma, anti-inflammatory agents (i.e., systemic glucocorticoids) and antifungal agents are the mainstay treatment of ABPA. The goal of therapy using glucocorticoids and antifungal agents is to suppress the immune hyperreactivity to A. fumigatus and attenuate the fungal burden. Since the systemic glucocorticoid therapy may lead to serious adverse effects including osteoporosis, avascular necrosis, myopathy, cushingoid appearance, hypertension, insomnia, and increased risk of infection, a glucocorticoid-sparing agent could be considered. Mepolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to interleukin-5, which is the key mediator for eosinophil differentiation, activation, migration, and survival. We review eight cases of ABPA treated successfully with mepolizumab. Treatment with mepolizumab was not restricted to the total immunoglobulin E level, the limiting factor for omalizumab in ABPA. In addition, mepolizumab therapy improved forced expiratory volume in one second, radiological findings, and patient quality of life.

Nintedanib-Induced Colitis Treated Effectively With Budesonide.

A 68-year-old male with a past medical history of interstitial pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) on nintedanib and chronic nintedanib-induced diarrhea for three years presented with hematochezia and worsening diarrhea. Diarrhea had persisted despite the use of cholestyramine and oral antidiarrhea medications. As part of the evaluation of diarrhea, he had undergone colonoscopy two years prior, which had shown non-specific moderate diffuse colitis. No significant abnormalities had been noted on physical exam and lab tests. On the present admission, colonoscopy showed diffuse erythematous, friable, and granular mucosa throughout the entire colon. Biopsies were taken and pathology was reported as acute superficial inflammation and possible nintedanib-induced colitis. Since the patient wanted to continue nintedanib as a part of IPF treatment, 9 mg oral budesonide was started, and the patient was followed up after four months. At his follow-up visit, the patient reported that diarrhea had completely resolved. In this report, we illustrate and discuss a case of nintedanib-induced colitis, which can be resistant to oral antidiarrhea medication and cholestyramine. The mechanism of this side effect is not completely understood; however, it may be related to direct inflammation of the intestinal epithelium, given that nintedanib metabolites are excreted primarily in the stool. As a result, it has been hypothesized that steroids could potentially treat this diarrhea by relieving this inflammation. In our patient, we elected to use budesonide due to less associated systemic side effects and possible similarity of inflammation between nintedanib-associated colitis and inflammatory bowel disease.

Duodenal angiosarcoma can be misdiagnosed as a Dieulafoy's lesion.

Angiosarcomas are soft-tissue neoplasms that originate from the vascular epithelium. The most commonly involved sites include the skin and subcutaneous tissues. In the GI tract, generally, angiosarcomas involve the spleen and liver, although locations in the small intestine and colon have been very occasionally reported. In the present study we report the unusual case of a man with duodenal epithelioid angiosarcoma, presenting with anemia and recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding, which was initially misdiagnosed as a Dieulafoy's lesion. It is important to consider the diagnosis of gastrointestinal malignancy, including unusual neoplasms such as angiosarcomas, in the setting of anendoscopic appearance such as hemorrhagic nodule, purpuric mass and/or recurrent bleeding lesions that are persistent despite repeat interventions. In such cases, a biopsy should be considered to confirm the diagnosis.

Two unusual sites of metastases of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

The most common sites of metastasis for esophageal cancers include the liver, lungs, and bones. We report a rare case of esophageal adenocarcinoma with metastasis to the subcutaneous perianal region as well as to the small bowel. Physicians should consider the possibility of metastasis in a patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma even after the onset of remission. It is essential to examine these patients and maintain a high index of suspicion for possible metastases. Early recognition helps in the accurate staging of the disease and enables the initiation of life-prolonging therapy and achieving meaningful palliation.

"Obscure" Appendiceal Orifice Polyps Can Be Challenging to Identify by Colonoscopy.

The primary purpose of screening colonoscopy is the detection and subsequent removal of precancerous polyps. However, effective recognition of appendiceal lesions with a standard endoscope is often challenging and is limited to the base of the cecum and appendiceal orifice. The majority of appendiceal polyps are found incidentally following an appendectomy, though rarely they may be discovered during a colonoscopy. Despite being visualized by colonoscopy, most of these polyps are generally referred for surgical resection. The risk of developing carcinoma in patients with appendiceal polyps is likely similar to that of other colonic polyps, so it is essential for the endoscopist to examine and visualize the appendiceal orifice thoroughly. Various techniques are available to the endoscopist that can increase the accuracy of colonoscopic evaluation. These include luminal inflation and deflation, looking behind and pressing haustral folds, and repetitive passage of the scope over poorly visualized areas. To our knowledge, only 3 cases have been reported in the literature describing the discovery of obscure appendiceal polyps using colonoscopic techniques. Here we describe three cases of appendiceal orifice polyps missed on initial visualization but subsequently protruded into the cecum following prolonged examination and gentle deflation in the cecum. The endoscopist should consider the possibility of an appendiceal neoplasm, especially if other colonic polyps have been found. Endoscopists should spend adequate time examining the cecum during a screening colonoscopy to expose and thoroughly examine the appendiceal region.

Does the Presence of Giant Pseudopolyps in a Patient with Newly Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Disease Increase the Risk of Major Thrombotic Events?

Giant inflammatory polyp and thromboembolism are uncommon complications in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Colon mucosal inflammation is possibly the main mechanism of pathogenesis for these two complications. IBD has long been associated with hypercoagulability and thromboembolism. In fact, thromboembolism has been noted in 0.7% to 7.7% of IBD patients, with the deep veins of the legs and the pulmonary veins accounting for 90% of the cases. The proposed mechanism of this hypercoagulability involves the promotion of hemostasis that results from the inflammatory process underlying the IBD, as well as the loss of proteins, including antithrombotic factors, resulting from the inflamed bowel and increased permeability of the colonic mucosa. This process may be exacerbated by the presence of giant inflammatory polyps, which are defined as polyps in the setting of IBD with dimensions greater than 1.5 cm. The presence of these polyps leads to an increase in inflamed colonic surface area, which can accelerate the rate of protein loss, leading to an increased incidence of thrombosis. Here, we report the case of a 21-year-old female with inferior vena cava and left renal vein thromboses secondary to a newly diagnosed IBD and the presence of severe giant inflammatory polyposis. These thromboses were detected incidentally in this patient after 1 week of hospitalization. She had presented with hypoalbuminemia and elevated inflammatory markers, which raised the suspicion for possible giant inflammatory polyposis as a potential risk for her major thromboembolic events. More studies are required to explore this plausible correlation further.

Capecitabine induced fingerprint changes.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Fingerprinting is recognized as an easily accessible means of personal identification; however, fingerprints can be damaged after administration of some chemotherapy agents that result in hand and foot syndrome (HFS). Fingerprint loss may also be due to reasons unrelated to HFS. This study evaluated the incidence of fingerprint changes in patients treated with capecitabine-containing chemotherapy regimens and its relations to various grades of HFS. METHODS: Seventy-one patients who received chemotherapy with or without capecitabine as part of their regimen were enrolled in the study. Fingerprints were collected once before the initiation of chemotherapy and once after the third course of chemotherapy. The fingerprints were examined by the Iranian Society of Forensic Physicians, for probable changes in the post-chemotherapy states. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the capecitabine group and 34 in a comparison group. Fingerprint changes were observed in 25 (67.6%) of the 37 patients in the capecitabine group and none in the comparison group. There was no correlation between the occurrence or severity of HFS and fingerprint changes (P = 0.880). In capecitabine group, the total dose and course numbers of capecitabine were not significant in patients with and without fingerprint changes. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, we recommend notifying patients who are considered for capecitabine therapy about the risk of fingerprint changes before the initiation of treatment, as this may have legal implications.

Impact of Education on Trauma Patients' Handover Quality; a Before-After Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Poor handover and inadequate transmission of clinical information between shifts cause a lot of problems in patient care and result in significant risks for physicians and patients. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of education and application of handover checklist on trauma patients' handover quality. METHODS: In this before-after trial, handover process of trauma patients in an educational hospital was evaluated before and after education and application of a handover checklist, abbreviated as "WHO MISSED IP?", using a questionnaire that consisted of 10 necessary items, which should be delivered during handover of trauma patients. A total score of 10 was considered for each patient handover, the score 10 out of 10 indicating that all 10 important pieces of patient information were correctly delivered. RESULTS: 52 pre and post-intervention handover sessions were evaluated (438 patients). Prior to intervention, 18% of patients were not delivered to the next shift, most of which were in the night shift handover (p < 0.001). From the pre-intervention to the post-intervention period, significant improvements were detected in all items except for diagnosis and consulting items. The mean duration of handover changed from 1.22 ± 0.24 minutes to 1.58 ± 0.23 minutes after intervention (p < 0.01). In the pre-intervention period, the score equal or greater than 9 was observed in 7.5% of patients, while after intervention, 63.6% of patients had score ≥ 9 regarding complete handover (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of the present study, teaching handover standards and application of handover checklist could be helpful in improving the quality of information delivery between emergency medicine residents and improve trauma patients' handover indices.

Low-Dose Fentanyl, Propofol, Midazolam, Ketamine and Lidocaine Combination vs. Regular Dose Propofol and Fentanyl Combination for Deep Sedation Induction; a Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Need for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is felt in emergency department (ED) more and more each day. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of low-dose fentanyl, propofol, midazolam, ketamine and lidocaine combination with regular dose of propofol and fentanyl combination for induction of deep sedation. METHODS: In this single-blind clinical trial, candidate patients for sedation and analgesia aged more than 15 and less than 60 years old, with pain score ≥6 were allocated to one of the groups using block randomization and were compared regarding onset of action, recovery time, and probable side effects. RESULTS: 125 patients with the mean age of 37.8 ± 14.3 years were randomly allocated to each group. 100% of the patients in group 1 (5 drugs) and 56.5% of the patients in group 2 (2 drugs) were deeply sedated in the 3rd minute after injection. The 2 groups were significantly different regarding onset of action (p = 0.440), recovery time (p = 0.018), and treatment failure (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Low-dose fentanyl, propofol, midazolam, ketamine and lidocaine combination was more successful in induction of deep sedation compared to regular dose of propofol and fentanyl combination. Recovery time was a little longer in this group and both groups were similar regarding drug side effects and effect on vital signs.